Date: 21 Mar 2005 13:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tatterdemalion.livejournal.com
interesting. so which one do we fix first..

Date: 21 Mar 2005 13:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceruleanst.livejournal.com
That question is addressed in the article. Despite it being easier to do, if we fixed global dimming first, global warming would kick our arses. So global warming effects must somehow be solved first. Or we can just let one continue to balance out the other and hope the side effects don't get too bad...

Date: 21 Mar 2005 21:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Be aware that the Horizon programme was quite sensational in some of its assertions. The article marmoe links to (below) is quite good.

I think at the moment we don't know enough, but Global Dimming presents an interesting* explanation as to why all the crap we pump into the atmosphere isn't having such a great effect.

*Interesting in the sense of the Chinese Curse.

Date: 21 Mar 2005 14:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marmoe.livejournal.com
Here is an extensive comment from scientists working in the field
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=105

Date: 21 Mar 2005 15:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellipsedream.livejournal.com
the last exchange between the interviewed scientists and author of that article was pretty interesting. i think that lots of people will always say, "we just don't know enough" or "prove it."

climate is so complex, we will be lucky to ever understand it fully. but, if we wait around (like we have), then it'll be too late. i guess people can argue until they are blue in the face, but in the end everything is what it is.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 July 2025 01:23
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios