den: (bugger)
[personal profile] den
Something [livejournal.com profile] makovette said in a forum made me realize I'd forgotten something important when designing the Bugs website. I checked to make sure it worked under Firefox (it did) and IE (it did after some editing), but I forgot to change the settings to see if it worked at less than 1024x768.

It doesn't. Well, it does but there is a considerable amount of side-scrolling required. Bugger.

I also don't know how it looks with other browsers. Can any Opera, Netscape, Mac, etc. users let me know if there's a problem with the site?

I know IE reports an error-on-page, but that's IE's problem. The Dreamweaver templates I used (I yam bereft of HTML skills) all validate to W3C HTML and CSS tests.

Date: 18 Sep 2004 19:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
I can highly recommend Firefox, and it's well worth the download. I still use 0.8. It has a pop-up killer that can be configured to allow certain site's popups, a cookie-blocker if you want, remote site image blocker, tabbed browsing, bookmark importing, download manager, and so on. There are Some Sites that don't display quite right, but only because they WANT you to use IE.

I recommend a change unless there is a reason you're still using Netscape, of course.

Date: 18 Sep 2004 19:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
You can force Netscape 4.x to display the page without styling: use @import.

At the top of your CSS file (or the style element in your page), add the following line:
@import url("/hide_from_ns4.css");


Then throw all the CSS that buggers up in Netscape 4.x, which is probably all of it, in hide_from_ns4.css (or whatever you want to call it). That way all the other browsers get your CSS, but Netscape 4 doesn't.

Date: 19 Sep 2004 00:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
You wouldn't believe how many times that has come in handy. Of all the holes in Netscape 4's support for CSS, that would be the only useful one.

Date: 19 Sep 2004 00:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
The learning curve from 4.x to Seamonkey is not terribly large. The whole original point of Seamonkey was to replace 4.x.

I'm using the stable Seamonkey trunk, because I'm not satisfied with Firefox. You'd probably find Venkman and DOM Inspector handy too.

The main things you'll probably notice are the fact websites look correct, tabs, the placement of the URL bar, the multiple account support in mailnews, and the bayesian spam filter. Oh, and some of the extensions.

Date: 19 Sep 2004 01:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
If you don't like tabs, you don't have to use them. They're in no way required, in fact, we barely even show they're there by default. Although this is getting quite off-topic...

Grab Mozilla 1.7.3, take it for a spin, and bug me around here if you have a problem. That, or bug us on IRC (irc://irc.mozilla.org/mozillazine) :-)

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2 January 2026 17:19
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios