The look of things

[den]

Something makovette said in a forum made me realize I'd forgotten something important when designing the Bugs website. I checked to make sure it worked under Firefox (it did) and IE (it did after some editing), but I forgot to change the settings to see if it worked at less than 1024x768.

It doesn't. Well, it does but there is a considerable amount of side-scrolling required. Bugger.

I also don't know how it looks with other browsers. Can any Opera, Netscape, Mac, etc. users let me know if there's a problem with the site?

I know IE reports an error-on-page, but that's IE's problem. The Dreamweaver templates I used (I yam bereft of HTML skills) all validate to W3C HTML and CSS tests.

Comments

[hendikins.livejournal.com]

The learning curve from 4.x to Seamonkey is not terribly large. The whole original point of Seamonkey was to replace 4.x.

I'm using the stable Seamonkey trunk, because I'm not satisfied with Firefox. You'd probably find Venkman and DOM Inspector handy too.

The main things you'll probably notice are the fact websites look correct, tabs, the placement of the URL bar, the multiple account support in mailnews, and the bayesian spam filter. Oh, and some of the extensions.

[acelightning.livejournal.com]

[hendikins.livejournal.com]

If you don't like tabs, you don't have to use them. They're in no way required, in fact, we barely even show they're there by default. Although this is getting quite off-topic...

Grab Mozilla 1.7.3, take it for a spin, and bug me around here if you have a problem. That, or bug us on IRC (irc://irc.mozilla.org/mozillazine) :-)

[acelightning.livejournal.com]