den: (You what?)
[personal profile] den


Today I was accused of Racism. I discovered I was a racist when I got into the express checkout line ahead of someone, and she said: "You racist white cunt!"

So there you go. Racist.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 11:59 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
Gleah. Well, you can tell her you're not racist, 'cause one of your friends, who is black, says so. So there. ;)

hee! thanks.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 12:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
"I'm not racist! Some of my best friends are Darkies." 8)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 12:18 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
*grins.* exactly. ;) I have to say, I haven't been called a darkie since I left the islands. It's a non-offensive term there, almost an affectionate one. Is it the same in Australia? No-one in the US seems to use it at all, and if they did, I bet it wouldn't be affectionate.

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 12:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Not so nice here. It's still used by old farts from WW2 and that era, but it's not PC.

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 03:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
Trust me: It's NOT a term of "affection" here in the USA, not even from one black to another. }>-p

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 03:44 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
I gathered that; I do currently live in the US. Like I said, no-one's called me that since I left the islands as a pre-teen. ;)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 19:00 (UTC)
chezmax: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chezmax
I've never even heard that term.


(I'm surprisingly sheltered from racist terms...)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 11:20 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
This is by no means a bad thing, and I'm going to refrain from un-sheltering you, because I like you. ;)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 24 Jan 2009 21:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zibblsnrt.livejournal.com
It's rare at best in my neck of the woods too, but recognized enough that it'd be a "hey, have a kick in the head" word as far as regards responses.

It's odd at times how place-dependent some terms like that can be; I'd never considered the idea of it not being an insult, or at least derived from one. (Then again, the wackiness around the word "Jew" in my part of Canada can confuse folks not used to it as well.)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 11:26 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
Hrm. I don't know about "not derived from one," actually. It probably was derived from one. But somewhere along the line it lost its sting, like "nigger" never did, and it's more likely to be used as a warmer sort of race identification, or even admiringly. "First, second and third place in class this year were all douglas. Those little darkies don't play they have brains, you know!"

... "dougla" means mixed race, East Indian and black, which lots of people are.

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 16:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
Never heard that term, and I thought (as an old newsman) I was fairly well "educated" in such things. Oy!

(And I'm not Jewish, either! *hehehe!!!*)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 25 Jan 2009 16:49 (UTC)
kuangning: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
It's a West Indian thing, and maybe (but not probably) even a specifically Trinidad-and-Tobago thing; our relatively brief period (roughly 1783, when the Spanish offered incentives to settle there and bring slave, to 1838, when the last attempts to keep the former slaves in service were formally given up) of slavery was succeeded by a somewhat-less-brief time of (mostly East Indian) indentured labor, from the late 1830s to 1917.

The two groups did a lot of mingling. My mother is a dougla, my father somewhat more mixed than that; I have Chinese cousins and white ones as well. It's a very interesting little country. Racial tension exists, but it's more likely to be black-vs-Indian than white-vs-anything, and it's more because of the way the two groups treated each other in settling the land after the whites had retreated. Indentured servants felt they were superior to the former slaves, while former slaves felt that they, having been there first and under harsher terms, should not have to give way to this new wave of interlopers.

It doesn't hurt, either, that whites had so brief a time of real power. Fifty-some years of slavery and seventy-odd of indentured service -- one average lifetime, and a man who was himself a slave at birth didn't have to watch his grandchildren grow up slaves too -- just doesn't breed generation upon generation of rancor the same way.

< /lecture> ;)

Re: hee! thanks.

Date: 26 Jan 2009 02:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
Thank you, dear lady, for insight (it was NOT a "lecture") into a piece of history of which I was sadly (and inexcusably) ignorant.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 18 January 2026 21:24
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios