My point is that NASA should've been getting better budgets to start off with, instead of having money being funneled into all sorts of other stuff. Aka the whole change of government policies and whatnot. At the current rate, NASA is just an afterthought "just to please the hippies".
Amen. But they've actually had their budget slashed instead, and they're fighting the surprisingly prevalent opinion that they get a huge chunk of our budget (ie, between 10% and 50%, which is utter bollocks) and the less-prevalent-but-just-as-vocal argument that any money spent on them is money wasted.
Every time they send a mission anywhere, we get a backlash of why are we spending money on space when there are still problems here on Earth? As if NASA's budget would be all it took to fix those, or as if we can't walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.
Oddly enough, the same people who cry this seem to have no problem with the amount of money we pour into killing each other on a daily basis. Go figure.
no subject
Date: 28 May 2008 09:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 May 2008 09:23 (UTC)Every time they send a mission anywhere, we get a backlash of why are we spending money on space when there are still problems here on Earth? As if NASA's budget would be all it took to fix those, or as if we can't walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.
Oddly enough, the same people who cry this seem to have no problem with the amount of money we pour into killing each other on a daily basis. Go figure.
< /rant>. Really. ;)