den: (bloke genes)
[personal profile] den
This looks like fun: a hovercraft that is also a ground-effects aircraft. I know hovercraft are also GEVs, but they are limited by their cushion height.

Date: 23 Oct 2007 02:01 (UTC)

Date: 23 Oct 2007 04:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
sadly:

"Notice: the 19XRW Hoverwingâ„¢ is not yet available for recreational use. Commercial, industrial, rescue, and military inquires only."

Date: 23 Oct 2007 09:31 (UTC)
ext_74: Baron Samadai in cat form (Default)
From: [identity profile] siliconshaman.livejournal.com
Or a business, air taxi anyone?

Date: 23 Oct 2007 09:46 (UTC)
ext_74: Baron Samadai in cat form (Default)
From: [identity profile] siliconshaman.livejournal.com
Interesting combination design, but I can see a couple of problems with it just from those video clips.

From the way it handles, it's obvious that the current incarnation is actually badly underpowered in terms of thrust and lift. The dedicated lifting fan seems adequate for the job in hover mode, but it either needs to increase engine capacity & rotor speed to increase thrust and therefore airspeed over the wings, or it needs bigger wings while operating in GEV mode.

The craft also has some stability problems, both on the z-axis and in terms of craft orientation. These have clearly been partly solved by the addition of a large horizontal tail-plane & vertical rudder assembly on a projecting boom [to gain leverage]... however, this does not seem to be working well as the craft still has problems handling, and the 'fix' introduces problems of it's own.

The current design is seriously flawed and tail heavy, the tail assemblage is vulnerable to impact damage, and it 'drags' significantly, meaning the craft flies in a nose up position, leaving the tail lower than the body of the craft. This increases aerodynamic drag and increases the risk of damage to the rudder as well as decreasing the applied thrust since it tends to vector it downwards rather than forwards.

I'd say if you were going to buy one, wait for the Mk2 or insist on a redesign around a bigger engine for a start, and with a swept forward wing configuration for stability and better rudder design.

Date: 23 Oct 2007 17:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] klishnor.livejournal.com
Interesting to see the old Russian "Ekranoplane" idea being dug out of mothballs. Let's hope they can make a go of it as the fuel efficiency is (IIRC) about 2 to 3 times that of an ordinary plane and over ocean it shouldn't be that much slower.

Date: 23 Oct 2007 22:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Every couple of years someone "invents" the ekranoplane again. I like this hovercraft hybrid idea.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 30 December 2025 11:29
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios