Date: 4 Oct 2006 13:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
Heh!!! While there were a few genuine issues (which were competently solved), IMHO the whole thing was grossly overblown. The panic was happily fueled by the media, as well as by some companies looking to make a fast buck selling "snake oil" (ie: "remedies" that were bogus, for a problem that didn't really exist).

The simple, free software/OS patches solved 99.9% of the problems, and the custom business software providers handled their clients' problems without the "meltdowns" that were feared.

Date: 4 Oct 2006 14:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Agreed. Any PC running Win95 or better wasn't going to fail, but the way the media carried on we were going to fall back to a pre-industrial society, the sun would explode, cats sleeping with dogs etc.

Most of the fixes had to be done on mainframes, and all of it was done long before the date turned. There was a problem, it was fixed, media goes berzerk. Film at 11.

Date: 4 Oct 2006 15:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
"The World Ends At Sunset!"

Details at 11...

:-D

Date: 5 Oct 2006 06:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torakiyoshi.livejournal.com
Agreed. Ergo why I referenced a strip drawn by someone who worked in computer proramming, of someone who worked in computer programming. :)

Have teh best

-=TK

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 21 August 2025 18:33
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios