Date: 9 Feb 2006 23:05 (UTC)
ext_32976: (Default)
From: [identity profile] twfarlan.livejournal.com
Jeez. That actually was a vast improvement.

Date: 9 Feb 2006 23:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Take away the bland dialogue witty, acid retorts and the strip becomes surreal.

Date: 10 Feb 2006 00:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redwaltz.livejournal.com
Wow. That totally makes Garfield actually readable. *L*

Date: 10 Feb 2006 01:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Odd, isn't it?

Date: 10 Feb 2006 01:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ngarewyrd.livejournal.com
Jon is a Sad Sad geezer

Date: 10 Feb 2006 02:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stoda.livejournal.com
Yeah, I gotta say they're WAY better that way.

Date: 10 Feb 2006 06:21 (UTC)

Date: 10 Feb 2006 10:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annvole.livejournal.com
Someone's responce:
Note to self. Things are funnier when the characters don't ruin it by talking too much.

I've got to remember that. Some of those altered Garfield strips are down-right hilarious. There are some comics that have frames with no dialog but just the characters looking at each other in reaction to what was before and they are quite funny...then they often have another panel with a punchline and that punchline is much funnier due to the no-dialog panel before it.

Green Acers TV show has a pig on it that everybody but the main character seemed to know what it was saying and the audience would know what the pig said too by what the humans would say in responce to the pig's grunts. The pig's sarcasim and character was much funnier that way.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 15 July 2025 21:47
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios