den: (Default)
[personal profile] den
"Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives... You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours... You, the mothers, who sent their sons from faraway countries wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."

Kemal Ataturk


They shall not grow old
As we that are left grow old;
age shall not weary them
Nor the years condemn:
At the going down of the sun
And in the morning
We will remember them
Lest we forget

Laurence Binyon

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bobbain.livejournal.com
half a million ?

The official figure with regards to the number of Australian's killed in the Gallipoli skirmish is 8,709 over a period of some months.

The number wounded was around 18,000.

The number of Australians killed in World War I was about 62,000.

The body count is very close to the body count in Iraq...

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/ (currently between 8,918 and 10.769.


Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oceansedge.livejournal.com
Every life lost is significant.

It's easy to forget that in the bean counter's number books, and the details of 'acceptable losses'

There is a story of an old man walking on the beach tossing stopping every few feet to toss a starfish into the sea. A young man walking observing him stopped him and asked what he was doing. The old man replied that the star fish would die if they didn't get back into the water, so he was throwing them back in. The young man was astounded and replied that it was such a huge beach, and there were so many star fish, the old man couldn't possibly make a difference. The old man, thought about it for a moment, picked up another star fish and threw it into the surf, "Made a difference to that one."

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bobbain.livejournal.com
it is also forgotten that soldiers (on the right side) die in the cause of "freedom and liberty". The enemy die because they are tyrants (or the unthinking puppets of tyrants).

We live in freedom. This freedom comes at the cost of sacrifice and the associated glory of those who died

...or so I'm led to believe

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zibblsnrt.livejournal.com
You do know there were more countries involved at Gallipoli than Australians, right? They weren't exactly alone, nor were they simply shooting themselves.

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bobbain.livejournal.com
Indeed. As the skirmish took place on Turkish soil I have a hunch there some Turkish people pulling the triggers.

I have walked along the beach at Gallipoli. As I understand it the British chose a more congenial spot. It was essentially a British blunder.

http://users.netconnect.com.au/~ianmac/gallipol.html

Allied deaths 50,000
Allied casualties 250,000
Turkish casualties 300,000

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zibblsnrt.livejournal.com
Thanks for demonstrating my point that it was not a minor skirmish.

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 25 Apr 2004 17:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bobbain.livejournal.com
:Thanks for demonstrating my point that it was not a minor skirmish.

I consider it a "minor skirmish" not from the number of people injured (which can range from something as minor as a scratch to a lost limb) but with regard to the fact that "Gallipoli" is just one event in the four years of World War I and isn't remembered at all in countries such as the United Kingdom where the term "In Flander's Fields" conjures up emotions, but where "Gallipoli" is mostly an "unknown".

Being born in and from the United Kingdom the realities of World War II have far greater significance. Against the backdrop of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the use of nuclear weapons in warfare "Gallipoli" is a memory confined primarily to this part of the world (as evidenced by an earlier contributor to this LJ entry) and of primary significance with respect to Australian/(NZ) national identity rather than an event of universal significance to be remembered into the 22nd Century and beyond...


Re: Anzac Day

Date: 25 Apr 2004 09:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kittiwake.livejournal.com
So that would be half a million then, wouldn't it?

Re: Anzac Day

Date: 24 Apr 2004 19:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tropism.livejournal.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gallipoli#Casualties

More like 44K dead on the allied side, with more than twice the number wounded, and 87K dead on the Ottoman side, with 164.5K wounded.

That's not particularly a skirmish. :)

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 9 January 2026 11:33
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios