den: (Found stuff)
[personal profile] den
Smog-busting paint soaks up noxious gases

This sounds like a really good idea, and I like it a lot! The down side is that there is less incentive to fix the problem at the source.

Re:

Date: 8 Feb 2004 05:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
You could have a giant catalytic converter at the bottom of the smokestacks, something that can be swapped out and repainted every couple of years.

They give a 5 year active life for the paint. If you painted something like the Sydney Harbour Bridge with it, you'd have an excellent toxin sink and rust-proofing to boot.

Re:

Date: 8 Feb 2004 16:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hafoc.livejournal.com
It's not going to last years in the base of a stack, because of the much higher concentrations. You could rig a wet scrubber with a catalyst and calcium carbonate in solution, that way constantly replacing the calcium carbonate as it's used up, but a plate painted with this magic paint would get eaten up almost instantly in a high concentration of NOx.

However, a NOx removal system that works on low concentrations is not a BAD thing. The more different special-contition "arrows" we have to our quiver, the more likely one will fit the conditions you're facing.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 10 January 2026 19:10
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios