den: (Found stuff)
[personal profile] den
Do other non-IE users see this page wrong?

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azhdragon.livejournal.com
yep, sure does suck in firefox 1.5

;-)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forest.livejournal.com
yup, firefox can't handle the formatting on the text properly.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azhdragon.livejournal.com
[checks page source]

ahh. there's the problem. whoever did it used Front Page.

tell them to get a real editor, like Editplus. or even Dreamweaver.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dabroots.livejournal.com
It's screwed up for me through both IE and Firefox, appearing the same through both browsers. Lots of excess space between words from the second paragraph downward. The clickable icons beginning with the house start by overlapping the "a" and "s" in "safewaste." Roughly 3/4 of the right side of the page is blank.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
Well, if I'm seeing it "right," then the designer should be taken out and shot.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valkyrwench.livejournal.com
Totally screwed in Firefox 2.0.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
It displays the same (badly) in every browser I have. IE6 included.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-harobed.livejournal.com
It's a mess in Safari, too.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:36 (UTC)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
I was wondering when somebody would check that. :)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
I can see it okay in IE6.02, but there are still a few issues.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Hooray for Frontpage.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:40 (UTC)
jamesb: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jamesb
Not good in SeaMonkey 1.0.5

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:46 (UTC)
jamesb: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jamesb
Only 40 errors reported by the W3C MArkup Validation Service.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 00:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
View -> Page Style -> None.

The table widths are buggered (insert rant about tables for layout here).

Date: 2 Nov 2006 01:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
I've used tables in my company website. Is that rantable?

Netscape 7.0

Date: 2 Nov 2006 01:44 (UTC)
frith: Cosgrove/Onuki (anime retelling) (Default)
From: [personal profile] frith
In Netscape, all the text and graphics are glued to the left hand side. Each word has its own line. At least it loaded quickly enough on dial-up.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 01:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hendikins.livejournal.com
Tables are fine (and designed/intended for) tabular data. Anything else I do tend to rant about...

Date: 2 Nov 2006 01:57 (UTC)
kayre: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kayre
On Safari (Apple) I get one skinny little column.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 02:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
in that case don't look at fleetwash.com.au source.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 02:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chinrest.livejournal.com
yes...hate that! (mozilla firefox here)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 02:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
Mine's 6.02something, and it's all goobed.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 02:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tatterdemalion.livejournal.com
remind me not to employ that person to design my business website for me 8-)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 03:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] micheinnz.livejournal.com
Major suckage in Safari.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 03:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jim-lane.livejournal.com
FireFox 2.0 can't handle it, either. Sorry...

Date: 2 Nov 2006 03:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
Hendikins says above to go View -> Page Style -> None and it works.

Now I can view their products, but the last-update line makes me wonder if it's still current. Their news page stops at Sept. 2004, so I bet their web guru left.

We look at our web page as a major part of our advertising and it's a weekly job keeping things up to date. There were 720 unique visits last month - that's a lot of brochures! I worked bloody hard to make the site accessible to all browsers (it was difficult getting IE to view it properly!) and I don't understand other companies not doing the same.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 04:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiado-ab.livejournal.com
Yep, but that's what happens when a page is designed using FrontPage. I swear any page I come across that appears horribly broken in Firefox was made with FrontPage.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 04:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damienps.livejournal.com
Frontpage has always added in lots of garbage code to make the pages it makes non-IE compatible.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 04:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewhitton.livejournal.com
That's odd. You'd think Frontpage would make it MORE IE compatible.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 04:48 (UTC)
jamesb: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jamesb
Frontpage makes sites non-IE incompatible ... and after the push update to IE7 that's occurring around about now, most of those previously only IE compatible pages will most-likely become IE7 incompatible.

Date: 2 Nov 2006 05:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damienps.livejournal.com
Arrgh, I meant buggers it up so it only looked what you designed on IE

Date: 2 Nov 2006 06:02 (UTC)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 07:49 (UTC)

Date: 2 Nov 2006 08:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cynicatlantis.livejournal.com
Reporting website carnage in Firefox 1.5.7 for Mac *pets it*

Date: 2 Nov 2006 15:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] breimh.livejournal.com
Yeah, it did the same for me, with both IE and FF, but IE I could at least read the text. The icons are out of place on IE. But, it is just because someone used FrontPage instead of a real editor. It'll just be a matter of the company hiring a real web designer, instead of leaving it to their sys. admin. to save a few $$$.

Date: 3 Nov 2006 01:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freetrav.livejournal.com
This is a beautiful example of how NOT to use FrontPage.

It's not an inherent problem with FrontPage (trust me on this), but there does appear to be an inherent problem with the FrontPage USER. This code is craptastic, even for badly-used FrontPage.

Date: 3 Nov 2006 12:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrrhack.livejournal.com
Yes this page sucks

Date: 3 Nov 2006 15:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marmoe.livejournal.com
It looked good on IE7 for the blink of an eye - then the page load was complete and it jumped to the garbled version you see on Firefox 2.

Date: 13 Nov 2006 04:30 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
looked good for a second in the yahoo browser, (we use them for internet, not IE) then it got all squishy.

Profile

den: (Default)
den

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 24 July 2025 01:49
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios