den (
den
) wrote
2005
-
02
-
05
05:59 pm
So. Broadband.
Peeweecam?
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
oceansedge.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 07:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
YES!!!!!!!!
no subject
hedgegoth.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 07:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
hellyeah!
no subject
jamesb
2005-02-05 07:06 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Den, what's your data transfer limit before outrageous charges per MB are applied?
no subject
dewhitton.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 07:24 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm on 2-way, 128/64 500MB $69.95 per month, then 15c/MB
Peeweecam might have to be on hold.
no subject
hedgegoth.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 08:10 am (UTC)
(
link
)
awwww.
I could maybe host, which would defray your upload bandwidth.
500mb isn't a helluvalot tho
no subject
makovette.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 08:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
So do a relay sort of thing with a java script that would pull the latest image of Den's PC once and spray it to users?
That would work very I think. A bit of math should yield the approximate MB/Month for N images.
Still, I figure I burn between 1.2-1.5G a month here. I don't have access to my router stats, so that's a pure swag...
Mako
no subject
dewhitton.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 11:30 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Ya know, I think that 500MB is downloads only, and PeeWeeCam would be uploads. I'll have to check.
no subject
dewhitton.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 09:46 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
it's not. It's a total of 500MB uploads & downloads.
bugger
no subject
oceansedge.livejournal.com
2005-02-06 06:14 am (UTC)
(
link
)
God damn - that's HIGHWAY robbery!!
no subject
dewhitton.livejournal.com
2005-02-06 06:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
yay Telstra monopoly!
no subject
walkertxkitty.livejournal.com
2005-02-05 05:44 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
If I didn't have dial-up which is too slow for such things, I'd watch. I love your pee wees!
11 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Peeweecam might have to be on hold.
no subject
I could maybe host, which would defray your upload bandwidth.
500mb isn't a helluvalot tho
no subject
That would work very I think. A bit of math should yield the approximate MB/Month for N images.
Still, I figure I burn between 1.2-1.5G a month here. I don't have access to my router stats, so that's a pure swag...
Mako
no subject
no subject
bugger
no subject
no subject
no subject