ext_50102 ([identity profile] freetrav.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] den 2006-03-16 10:24 am (UTC)

If the Laws are rearranged as you've proposed, you've just made it essentially impossible to use robots where a sentient or near-sentient mind is required, but it's too dangerous for humans - since you've made robot-self-preservation a higher priority than following orders. ", go into that high-radiation field,
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<do [...] radiation,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

If the Laws are rearranged as you've proposed, you've just made it essentially impossible to use robots where a sentient or near-sentient mind is required, but it's too dangerous for humans - since you've made robot-self-preservation a higher priority than following orders. "<robot>, go into that high-radiation field, <do something essential to stopping the radiation, but which requires independent thought to accomplish>." "Bugger you, guv, that shit'll wreck me - go in and do it yerself!"

The most I can see is *maybe* splitting the Second Law as you propose, and then reprioritizing to owner-or-proxy/self-preservation (present Third Law)/non-owner-or-proxy.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting